--> Skip to main content

Infrared Image Processing

Recently I acquired an infrared converted camera. Somebody on Ebay converted a conventional Sony A5000 by simply removing the IR filter over the sensor. Unlike many professionally converted cameras, my IR camera does not have any IR filter over the sensor.

So without a filter over the lens images don't look that different from a conventional camera. But I've been using a 720nm IR filter. To the eye the filter looks black. But through the camera you can see an image. And surprisingly the daylight exposures are very similar to conventional photography.

One issue that is very much subjective about the use of digital infrared is how to process images. There's no way to be true to what you see, the IR world is magically different! For most of the IR work I've done so far, I've converted to grayscale. And unlike conventional photography, I'm ok with seriously moving those sliders around. Opening the shadows and pulling in the highlights to the extreme doesn't look as hokey as that aweful HDR look.

Here I thought I'd share just one image that I processed three different ways. First, is the black and white version. Please note, all the foliage in this photo is a lush green.


The second version is takes the BW version of with the same settings and applies a custom camera profile I built using Adobe's DNG Camera Profile tool. The reason for this is that by default, Lightroom and Photoshop (as well as Capture One etc.) won't allow you to move the color balance far enough. Basically out-of-camera the images are off the charts color balance wise. You can download my profile to test here. This file should be placed here: Mac Users:
Users>username>Library>Application Support>Adobe>Camera Raw>Camera Profiles>PC Users: (If you cannot see this path, you may need to unhide these files
Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 10: C:\Users\Username\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles.



And another popular way of dealing with color IR images is "channel swapping". So I took the second image into Photoshop (there's no channel swap option in LR.) So in PS, I added a correction layer and took the red channel and zero'd out red and moved the blue to 100, visa-versa in the blue channel.


So what'da think?





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Linhof Serial Year List - Salomon Says

Recently I've acquired a few Linhof cameras. I got a 5x7 view camera from Oakland Museum's White Elephant Sale. Later I stumbled upon a Color Kardan 90 Jahre Jubalaeum edition on Craigslist. And more recently, I found a "baby Technika" 2x3 (6x9) at Oakland's East Bay Depot for Creative Re-use. Not knowing much about Linhof large format cameras, I tried getting more info online, and came across a strange thread on the Large Format Photography Forum . Basically on this thread various Linhof owners ask a guy named Bob Salomon what year their Linhof was made. And the thread is over 100 pages long! Sifting through that thread is mindnumbing. Why Bob doesn't just publish the list of serial numbers is beyond me. Maybe it's just nice to feel needed. So I started compiling a spreadsheet of the serial numbers and the answer Bob gives. If you don't feel like spending a couple days reading this thread to get a hint as to the age of your Lin

From the Archive: Obsolete Film Data Sheet Scans - ORWO Information

Here's a sheet I got from writing ORWO Technischer Kundendienst back in the 1980's. It lists development times for all the ORWO Black and White films sold for export at the time (NP15, NP22, NP 27) combined with western developers Microphen, Atomal, Rodinal, Refinal, D-76, & ID-11. A little bit of ORWO history- Germany's big photo film/paper manufacturer up until Germany's losing WWII was AGFA (short for  A ktien G esellschaft F ür A nilinfabrikation - or corporation for some sort of plastic manufacture.) Germany was occupied by the winning powers USSR/USA/GB/FR and the rift between the USSR led to some complications for industries. Depending on your view of history the US and western allies were much friendlier to the land they occupied (remember the USSR lost many millions of their citizens to the NAZIs which made them much less tolerant.) In any case, some factories in the east moved to the west with many key employees. Most photo enthusiasts know of the t

Should I ditch my Sony a6500 for a A7r IV?

Recently, I bought a Sony a7r IV. The main reason was for stock photography. The high resolution along with improved focusing and biggish buffer would allow me to make better people (and other) stock photos for my various stock endeavors.  The Sony system has treated me well. I own two A7r II's for stock and other work, and two a6500's for event photography. The A7r II's aren't ideal for events for a couple reasons. The focus tracking is pretty good, but maybe not enough for fast paced people on stage. Another reason is that silent shooting is only available on single shot mode. And (admittedly a first world problem,) the files are much bigger than needed. Well, the last problem, too big files isn't an issue with the A7rIV if you use it in APS-c mode. The files are effectively the same size as the a6500: 24 mp. Focus with the IV is even faster and more effective than the very capable a6500. And with those smaller files, the IV has no problem with buffer overflow. So