--> Skip to main content

Capture One and an Infrared Converted Camera - Some Settings

Recently I added a Infra-Red converted camera to my stable of digital cameras. There's been a surprisingly steep learning curve.

The camera was an amateur conversion - some guy on Ebay did his own conversion by simply (I'm sure it's not that simple really) removing the IR filter. As I am using Sony mirrorless cameras, I thought it'd be cool to have a tiny little IR body to play around with. In this case it's a Sony a5000.

Without any filter in front of the lens, this camera creates unremarkable results. In fact, image quality suffers without much notable difference in the visible image. However, if you put a filter on the lens that limits visible light and lets IR pass through the results can be very dramagic. There are some ways to make for interesting color images, but thus far my favorite use of this technique is black and white.

I'm fairly new to Capture One and try avoid Adobe products when I can. So I thought I'd share some of the conversion techniques I'm playing with with you dear readers.

The RAW files that come out of camera look very strange in a less-than-cool way. They are very flat and orange-red in color. Below are a few examples and some simple correction techniques that I find appealing.

Here's what the RAW ARW image looks like with no adjustments (see figure 1 below.) It's flat, dark and very orange.

Figure 2 is the out of camera black & white image without corrections, it's dark and flat. This is how the image looks on the back of the Sony a5000.

Figure 3 is just basic levels correction, and minor adjustments to taste.... except notice that the saturation setting is dialed all the way back.

Figure 4 shows a simple one click auto settings adjustment to the out of camera JPG file, which is simple and quite appealing.

Figure 5 is an example of something weird that happens with the saturation set to "normal." Otherwise all the settings are the same as figure 3. I found this quite surprising and might be a useful tweak for you to try if you're doing the same thing as I am.

figure 1 - Infrared Adjustments in Capture One - Raw Straight out of Camera - No Corrections
figure 2 -Infrared Adjustments in Capture One - JPG Straight out of Camera - No Corrections
figure 3 -Infrared Adjustments in Capture One - Levels and Basic Corrections to RAW ARW file
figure 4 -Infrared Adjustments in Capture One - JPG Straight out of Camera - Auto Corrections


figure 5 -Infrared Adjustments in Capture One - JPG Straight out of Camera - No Corrections but with Saturation set to Normal














Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Linhof Serial Year List - Salomon Says

Recently I've acquired a few Linhof cameras. I got a 5x7 view camera from Oakland Museum's White Elephant Sale. Later I stumbled upon a Color Kardan 90 Jahre Jubalaeum edition on Craigslist. And more recently, I found a "baby Technika" 2x3 (6x9) at Oakland's East Bay Depot for Creative Re-use. Not knowing much about Linhof large format cameras, I tried getting more info online, and came across a strange thread on the Large Format Photography Forum . Basically on this thread various Linhof owners ask a guy named Bob Salomon what year their Linhof was made. And the thread is over 100 pages long! Sifting through that thread is mindnumbing. Why Bob doesn't just publish the list of serial numbers is beyond me. Maybe it's just nice to feel needed. So I started compiling a spreadsheet of the serial numbers and the answer Bob gives. If you don't feel like spending a couple days reading this thread to get a hint as to the age of your Lin

Should I ditch my Sony a6500 for a A7r IV?

Recently, I bought a Sony a7r IV. The main reason was for stock photography. The high resolution along with improved focusing and biggish buffer would allow me to make better people (and other) stock photos for my various stock endeavors.  The Sony system has treated me well. I own two A7r II's for stock and other work, and two a6500's for event photography. The A7r II's aren't ideal for events for a couple reasons. The focus tracking is pretty good, but maybe not enough for fast paced people on stage. Another reason is that silent shooting is only available on single shot mode. And (admittedly a first world problem,) the files are much bigger than needed. Well, the last problem, too big files isn't an issue with the A7rIV if you use it in APS-c mode. The files are effectively the same size as the a6500: 24 mp. Focus with the IV is even faster and more effective than the very capable a6500. And with those smaller files, the IV has no problem with buffer overflow. So

Who Makes Ultrafine Film?

One of these 120 paper backings stands out as being different. Not a big surprise, since one is Kodak, and another is Ilford. But our mystery film Ultrafine has the *exact* same backing paper as seen in this scan. What does this mean? There are a few possibilities that come to mind. It's always possible that the backing paper is made by a third party I suppose. Not likely, as there isn't much of a market for 120 film anymore, and I've never seen another non-Ilford film with the same backing paper. So is this mystery film, Ultrafine actually Ilford then? Another, more likely theory is that it is made by Kentmere. Kentmere and Ilford are both part of the Harman group . In researching this I just read that Harman was the name of the founder of Ilford company in the late 19th century. So how is are the Ultrafine (E)Xtreme films? I bought a bulk roll of the 400 speed. Frankly it's pretty grainy and soft. I don't hate it, and I'm trying to work with the grain.