--> Skip to main content

Linhof Serial Year List - Salomon Says





Recently I've acquired a few Linhof cameras. I got a 5x7 view camera from Oakland Museum's White Elephant Sale. Later I stumbled upon a Color Kardan 90 Jahre Jubalaeum edition on Craigslist. And more recently, I found a "baby Technika" 2x3 (6x9) at Oakland's East Bay Depot for Creative Re-use.

Not knowing much about Linhof large format cameras, I tried getting more info online, and came across a strange thread on the Large Format Photography Forum. Basically on this thread various Linhof owners ask a guy named Bob Salomon what year their Linhof was made. And the thread is over 100 pages long!

Sifting through that thread is mindnumbing. Why Bob doesn't just publish the list of serial numbers is beyond me. Maybe it's just nice to feel needed.

So I started compiling a spreadsheet of the serial numbers and the answer Bob gives. If you don't feel like spending a couple days reading this thread to get a hint as to the age of your Linhof, and don't feel like registering with this forum and asking Bob, you can use this spreadsheet and might be able to extrapolate the date of manufacture of your Linhof.

I'm titling the spreadsheet "Salomon Says" after Bob Saloman the man with the manufacture serial/date list.

Have a look: https://tinyurl.com/yycs2kjv (links to a Google Sheets)
(still in progress)
 
BTW: minor edits made to fix Soloman mis-spelling pointed out by reader Sabrina. Thanks and sorry as I hardly ever read comments. I do this blog for catharsis really. P.s. here's a dad joke I came up with on the very topic of Soloman/Saloman/other variations of the king of ancient times... Q: What's the wisest fish? A: King Salmon ... get it King Salmon and King Solaman are kinda close?! Well if you have to explain a joke it's not funny! But I still enjoyed telling it.

Comments

  1. Thanks! What a great resource. BTW you misspelled Bob's name... it is spelled Salomon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oops, will fix. Guess the pun works either way as it's close enough to Simon Says :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should I ditch my Sony a6500 for a A7r IV?

Recently, I bought a Sony a7r IV. The main reason was for stock photography. The high resolution along with improved focusing and biggish buffer would allow me to make better people (and other) stock photos for my various stock endeavors.  The Sony system has treated me well. I own two A7r II's for stock and other work, and two a6500's for event photography. The A7r II's aren't ideal for events for a couple reasons. The focus tracking is pretty good, but maybe not enough for fast paced people on stage. Another reason is that silent shooting is only available on single shot mode. And (admittedly a first world problem,) the files are much bigger than needed. Well, the last problem, too big files isn't an issue with the A7rIV if you use it in APS-c mode. The files are effectively the same size as the a6500: 24 mp. Focus with the IV is even faster and more effective than the very capable a6500. And with those smaller files, the IV has no problem with buffer overflow. So

Who Makes Ultrafine Film?

One of these 120 paper backings stands out as being different. Not a big surprise, since one is Kodak, and another is Ilford. But our mystery film Ultrafine has the *exact* same backing paper as seen in this scan. What does this mean? There are a few possibilities that come to mind. It's always possible that the backing paper is made by a third party I suppose. Not likely, as there isn't much of a market for 120 film anymore, and I've never seen another non-Ilford film with the same backing paper. So is this mystery film, Ultrafine actually Ilford then? Another, more likely theory is that it is made by Kentmere. Kentmere and Ilford are both part of the Harman group . In researching this I just read that Harman was the name of the founder of Ilford company in the late 19th century. So how is are the Ultrafine (E)Xtreme films? I bought a bulk roll of the 400 speed. Frankly it's pretty grainy and soft. I don't hate it, and I'm trying to work with the grain.