--> Skip to main content

Trying to Tame Fomapan's Contrast

As the film industry falls apart and cheap film is hard to come by, especially film available in all formats. I've bought a lot of Fomapan. Fomapan (also rebadged Arista.edu) has been a bit more of a challenge than I had expected. I don't hate the film, but I find lots of shortcomings.

I knew going in to ordering Fomapan that the reciprocity characteristic was very unfavorable for those unintentionally working with long exposure times. I tried using that to my advantage with neutral density filters for long daylight exposures.

Richmond-San Rafael Bridge - Fomapan 100 long daylight exposure

There I found two problems. (1) Contrast and (2) grain. Many of my long daylight exposures had highlights that blocked up into white mush when printed. The other seemingly amazing thing to me was the grain structure of those long exposures. The printable negs were incredibly grainy- even when printed in an enlarger to smallish sizes (square with rebate border on 8x10 paper making about a 7x7" image.) In some cases the coarse grain almost mimicked smooth tones - helping in a way. I liked that look - but in every conventional analog measure- Fomapan isn't a good film.

In any case, I've been trying for some time to tame the contrast of Fomapan. I started with Rodinal (R09 or whatever the kids are calling it now) and semi-stand development. I like Xtol alot and tried the suggested 1:1 dilution (the weakest dilution suggested by Kodak now.)

Eventually I spent hours coming over image searches for Fomapan and just looking at the images. In that search I found a guy using Fomapan calling himself  "Mr Leica" with some nice results. First off, I should point out that "Mr Leica" seemed to be using mostly other makes of cameras- Hasselblad, Mamiya, even an old half frame Pen-f as I recall. But he had lots of really nice portraits, mostly of very pretty gals.

"Mr Leica" has a presence on Flickr and shares some details about his processing on most of the images he shares. And on some of my favorite photos of his, he had a rather strange recipe for his Fomapan: more or less 10 minutes at 86 Fahrenheit (!!! very warm) in Xtol 1:3 (very dilute and no longer recommended by manufacturer!!) Despite his fabulous photos, from what he wrote, he seemed not to have a very good understanding of film photography (for example describing Fomapan as a "low contrast film".) But I have to admit, he really made it work.

Portrait of my daughter Ella - Fomapan 100 - Xtol 1:3 10 minutes at 86 f. Taken with a Super Speed Graphic and Rodenstock Ysarex 210mm f6.3 @ f11 or so.
Portrait of my daughter Ella - Fomapan 100 - Xtol 1:3 10 minutes at 86 f. Taken with a Super Speed Graphic and Graflex Optar 135mm f5.6 @ f11 or so.

I gave his recipe a try and am reasonably happy with the results. I'm still on the fence as to continue using Fomapan or switch to a more reliable emulsion like Ilford Fp4 or HP5 for twice the price. I love Fuji Acros, but it's not available in sheets.


Popular posts from this blog

Linhof Serial Year List - Salomon Says

Recently I've acquired a few Linhof cameras. I got a 5x7 view camera from Oakland Museum's White Elephant Sale. Later I stumbled upon a Color Kardan 90 Jahre Jubalaeum edition on Craigslist. And more recently, I found a "baby Technika" 2x3 (6x9) at Oakland's East Bay Depot for Creative Re-use. Not knowing much about Linhof large format cameras, I tried getting more info online, and came across a strange thread on the Large Format Photography Forum . Basically on this thread various Linhof owners ask a guy named Bob Salomon what year their Linhof was made. And the thread is over 100 pages long! Sifting through that thread is mindnumbing. Why Bob doesn't just publish the list of serial numbers is beyond me. Maybe it's just nice to feel needed. So I started compiling a spreadsheet of the serial numbers and the answer Bob gives. If you don't feel like spending a couple days reading this thread to get a hint as to the age of your Lin

Lossy DNG File Sizes by ISO.

Fairly recently I discovered the magic of lossy DNG's. My stock photo library is ever growing. Though JPG's might really be enough for my archive, I've been keeping my raw files. RAW files take up lots of space. And RAW files can't typically keep user generated EXIF data in the file. RAW files keep their keywords and other metadata in a sidecar, that is if you regularly save the EXIF data to file. So recently I've been converting all my RAW files to lossy DNG's. After testing the highest ISO setting on the new-to-me A7R IV, I converted the files to lossy DNG's only to find a surprise. The very high ISO lossy DNG's were much larger than the original Sony RAW files! Lossy ARW vs Lossy DNG full image sample So I thought it would be a good test to shoot from the lowest to highest ISO, convert to lossy DNG and see where the file size savings invert. Here's the data as seen in the above screen shot: ISO Lossy Sony ARW Raw file size (MB) Lossy DNG file siz

From the Archive: Obsolete Film Data Sheet Scans - ORWO Information

Here's a sheet I got from writing ORWO Technischer Kundendienst back in the 1980's. It lists development times for all the ORWO Black and White films sold for export at the time (NP15, NP22, NP 27) combined with western developers Microphen, Atomal, Rodinal, Refinal, D-76, & ID-11. A little bit of ORWO history- Germany's big photo film/paper manufacturer up until Germany's losing WWII was AGFA (short for  A ktien G esellschaft F ür A nilinfabrikation - or corporation for some sort of plastic manufacture.) Germany was occupied by the winning powers USSR/USA/GB/FR and the rift between the USSR led to some complications for industries. Depending on your view of history the US and western allies were much friendlier to the land they occupied (remember the USSR lost many millions of their citizens to the NAZIs which made them much less tolerant.) In any case, some factories in the east moved to the west with many key employees. Most photo enthusiasts know of the t